Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has evolved over its 40-year history into a complex process that can be difficult to decipher. This panel briefly outlined the NEPA processes surrounding approval of drilling for oil in the BP/Deepwater Horizon incident and discussed the role of so-called "categorical exclusions." Categorical exclusions are intended to expedite the environmental review process by excluding repetitive and low impact activities. The expansion of categorical exclusions in a variety of settings over the last decade led the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to issue draft guidance in February seeking to reduce the instances where inappropriate reliance on exclusions would thwart the purposes of NEPA. The public comment period ended in May, just as the issue was gaining new interest in light of the Deepwater Horizon spill, because the Minerals Management Service had granted BP an exclusion for the Macondo well. On May 14, CEQ and Department of the Interior announced a review of MMS NEPA procedures for outer continental shelf oil and gas exploration and development with a public comment period ending June 17, 2010.
These events generated many questions and comments about CEQ's proposed reforms. The panel brought together interested parties from industry, government, and the environmental community to talk about the reform proposals and their potential impacts.
Moderator:
James McElfish, Staff Attorney and Director, Sustainable Use of Land Program, Environmental Law Institute
Panelists:
Monica Goldberg, Senior Attorney, The Ocean Conservancy
Edward A. Boling, Senior Counsel, Council on Environmental Quality
Dr. Tom Simpson, Vice President and Technology Fellow, CH2M HILL
Associates may log on to access event mp3 and slideshow.